![]() The "rubber armoured " leitz although a step forward in terms of desiccators and water proffing ( rubber top caps, objective bumpers and protection for the edge of the prism housing ) the set did not deliver the quality imaging of the blc or cxn "U-Bootglas", the 8圆0 Leitz (beh) was prone to gogging, and occular construction was complicated and it was not in the same league as the "slim" or "fat" commander produced by Zeiss ( blc) or Busch (cxn). The leitz "Tuna can" * - a porous (body), without decsiccators which were subject to fogging - quite good optically comfortable eye relief, good coatings but as with all German sets - push on filters (commonly a set of amber and red). ![]() Leitz - commonly seen in the "Tuna Can" verision and the Porro II "rubber armoured" variety are commonly seen. The Kriegsmarine used only Leitz and Zeiss binoculars - no others. ![]() ![]() I thought I would place this here as it relates directly to optical gear used by the Kriegsmarine, having come from the U-570 thread. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |